Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No ones giving up a big haul. First there’s the question of why are you willing to trade away a young star on a rookie deal and then we also have to give him a big deal upon trading for him?
Not likely |
Florio's report barely reads as a report at all. It's complete speculation, citing speculation by aledged NFL teams.
"Hey the Chiefs signed two corners. I wonder if they'll trade Marcus Peters?" |
How many corners do they even currently have under contract?
|
Quote:
Maybe Veach knows that Peters won’t be here soon, so why let him go for a 3rd rd comp when you can get something better now? |
Quote:
And if this is really the case, why would another team give up a haul for a guy with so many problems |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I really hope this doesn’t happen unless we are getting a high 1st + future 2nd or two 2018 2nds. Even then, I don’t know.
Actually, **** that too. This guy forces a turnover every other game. He needs to stay. |
Maybe we are going to be the Red Raiders 2.0, we won't need defense.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
IF this report true, it means that Peters is not good for the locker room and he’s not good for our team. It can’t really mean anything else at this point. It could mean many things, but his 5th year option is coming and I think it’s fair to see why this franchise would not commit any kind of deal money to him. |
We aren't trading Peters. Top 3 at his position on a rookie deal. We have him cheap next year, will exercise his fifth year option then either franchise or sign to a long term deal. He's here for three more years min. This is Florio drumming up clicks in a dead period
|
I remember when Derrick Johnson and Justin Houston wouldn't re-sign with KC. Peters will re-sign
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.