![]() |
Quote:
|
/heybucknasty/status/1171810849801101313 add twitter.com to the address.
Yeah, I think this case is over. Edit: rape accuser sitting in AB's lap showing her new engagement ring which her future husband gave to her. |
Would you take a load on your back and a little rape for over a million?
Set you up for life.....just gotta take a little forced lovin'. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Parallels between the Antonio Brown case and the Derrick Rose sexual assault civil case. Both were filed as civil lawsuits without a prior police report being filed. Rose was found not liable. And the NBA waited for the civil justice system to play out. NFL should do the same.</p>— Daniel Wallach (@WALLACHLEGAL) <a href="https://twitter.com/WALLACHLEGAL/status/1171747315641704448?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 11, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
Federal diversity jurisdiction [layman - right to file with the federal court] requires by statute that the amount in controversy exceed $75K. It's a boilerplate PLEADING requirement, that weeds out small and insignificant claims [layman - you can't take your neighbor to federal court for breaking your garden gnome]. So the $75K is just a threshold. The 'actual' damages will be developed in discovery and both the actual damages and the merit of punitive damages will be argued in a trial. It's not a specific dollar amount the plaintiff is bound by [except to prove that the value of the matter exceeds it]. She can still seek millions, billions, . . . bajillions, eventually. |
AB now being investigated for child endangerment.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
People might say oh well tryeek, history DV, blah but thing is Reek has never publicly acted like Brown has. It's fact that Brown thinks he is above everything and everyone. |
Quote:
|
This just keeps getting better and better.
|
The NFL better let this play out legally. If not, they will open a door to a shitstorm for it's players.
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Clarification on the Allegheny County DA's interest in Antonio Brown here.<br><br>Had nothing to do with the lawsuit filed in federal court in Florida. Was concerning a possible child endangerment situation, which the DA's office eventually determined it could not investigate. <a href="https://t.co/vsrqaaukBu">https://t.co/vsrqaaukBu</a></p>— Phil Perry (@PhilAPerry) <a href="https://twitter.com/PhilAPerry/status/1171852446014091266?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 11, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">To clarify: Allegheny County DA is not investigating sexual assault allegations against Antonio Brown. DA was contacted by Northern Regional Police Department concerning a possible child endangerment situation involving Brown, but did not move forward with investigating the claim</p>— Kevin Duffy (@KevinRDuffy) <a href="https://twitter.com/KevinRDuffy/status/1171851972904923136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 11, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
No way BB wants this much heat LMAO
|
Quote:
but the fact shit keeps coming out wheew. |
Wow. That's not about him throwing his shit over the balcony either. What the **** else has this dude been up to.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
twitter.com/heybucknasty/status/1171810849801101313 Videos of her in ABs lap, in bed etc. |
Quote:
http://www.810whb.com/2019/06/10/whb...reak-sons-arm/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
Not sure if there's a virus, but I'm not clocking on the link to find out. I'll let DaFace click on the link first. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/o9zN5lWNwB">pic.twitter.com/o9zN5lWNwB</a></p>— iLikeYourBeats (@heybucknasty) <a href="https://twitter.com/heybucknasty/status/1171810938854531074?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 11, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
These will not help her cause...
|
Quote:
|
Doesn't look very rapey to me. Looks awfully adultery though.
|
Quote:
|
If she's making this up, she should be hammered with every inch of the law.
|
Quote:
It was never any secret that they were in a relationship. |
Quote:
Then there's a video of her half naked in ABs bed. |
You can have consensual sex with a person and then get raped by them at a different time.
|
Quote:
|
He rapes, but he saves.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I am assuming this is why its in a civil court not criminal because no prosecutor would pick this case up. You can be around someone/be in videos/ even be half naked with someone in their bed and still not consent to anything, it's just very difficult if not impossible to prove that in criminal court.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
but Britney is white, right? I am not understanding the video i saw, I guess. (Maybe it's because I can't do audio right now?)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Anyone else using Firefox and not seeing any embedded tweets?
|
Quote:
75k is the minimum you must demand in order for a case to be filed in Federal court. That is not the final demand and usually isn't. An example is the case of the Nigerians vs. Jessie Smollett et al. in which they wanted to file in Federal court (due to the interstate aspect of the case ... which is the same situation here). They filed for 75k (the minimum). Once filed, the damages can be requested in court and awarded by the jury (or not ... as the case may be). The 75k is meaningless in real terms. FAX |
Quote:
We don't have someone else who thinks the Gruden pictures look suspiciously like Gruden, do we? Parody is well and truly dead... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
same if my spleen ever falls out - who needs a real doctor?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
yep corrected myself in a few other post my bad. |
Quote:
Anyway, it's a confusing rule the Feds have. I suppose they do it in order to allow cases to proceed while reducing the number of frivolous lawsuits for a buck here and a ten-spot there. One would think the baseline would be higher, but attorneys make those rules and you know what attorneys are like. Any case is better than no case to those guys. FAX |
Quote:
So it has to do with our federal/state system. You can only get into federal court if you qualify. One way to qualify is if the parties are from different states (diversity jurisdiction). To qualify under those circumstances, they want to be certain the amount at issue is reasonably significant. The $75,000 isn't a magic number, just one that is set by statute. I have no doubt it has changed over the years. If you can't check all the necessary boxes, then you must file in state court instead of federal. |
Quote:
LMAO |
Quote:
Wouldn't be surprised if the $75K number isn't revisited and revised sometime relatively soon, as it's not nearly the money it was when enacted. But yeah, the purpose is to keep small local matters out of federal court. The entirety of the jursidictional requirement isn't just the dollar amount though. You also have to involve entities of different states [if they're both from the same state, it's entirely state business], and the matter has to be filed in a federal court that has a connection to the issue at hand [ie, can't file a federal suit in a federal court in California for a car accident that happened in Maine, etc.]. So like, take Tracy Morgan's accident. NY resident, extensively injured in NJ by a GA truck driver working for an INTL corp HQed in AR. Claim filed in US Dist Ct, Dist of NJ. |
Fascinating. I should've became a lawyer.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bob Kraft when he learns that AB is apparently skilled at hand jobs.
<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/PeLplUVFMpcHe" width="480" height="360" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/boy-things-johnson-PeLplUVFMpcHe">via GIPHY</a></p> |
Quote:
Besides, if I'm not mistaken, over 90% of Congress is comprised of attorneys. Therefore, lawyers do, in fact, set that 75k standard. In the spirit of Amicus Curiae, put that in your jury box. FAX |
Quote:
But I mean yeah, if the more I point out how checks and balances and separation of powers and consensus and all that factors into a decision, the bigger one makes the conspiracy, we're just stuck in an endless loop. |
Quote:
Because, as we all know, the legal world relies upon accuracy and specificity. I said lawyers make the rule. You said it was Congress. I'm simply referring to the fact that Congress is ... well ... lawyers. I rest my case ... while leaning back to smoke an Avo Double R. FAX |
Clown.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Tom Brady on the Antonio Brown situation - "Things that don't involve me, don't involve me" <a href="https://t.co/R5jAiYiu1o">pic.twitter.com/R5jAiYiu1o</a></p>— Patriots on NBCSB (@NBCSPatriots) <a href="https://twitter.com/NBCSPatriots/status/1171880545636233217?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 11, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
They exempt list this piece of shit yet?
|
Quote:
|
It blows my mind how narratives work.
The narrative form day one was Tyreek was guilty. The narrative the second this news broke was that it was a cash grab simply because of timing and the fact that it’s a civil suit. People make up their minds so ****ing quickly. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Dudes almost killed a kid, been accused of domestic abuse and rape, ****er over his personal trainer who is suing, and had an incident with a personal chef. Now there’s something about child endangerment. Not to mention all of the football stuff. The guy is a grade A POS who should NEVER be given the benefit of the doubt. |
Quote:
FYP. :p But seriously, what do you want him to say? All he can do is wait and let those who are able to decide (NFL and the Patriots) decide whether he stays or goes, or is suspended or not. |
Quote:
|
Patriots are letting Brown break helmet rules of course
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/PhilHecken?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PhilHecken</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/UniWatch?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@UniWatch</a> doesn't look like Antonio Brown is wearing the Xenith shadow. Looks like an older model Schutt to me. <a href="https://t.co/P0yzAblmXa">pic.twitter.com/P0yzAblmXa</a></p>— Barsotta (@Barsotta) <a href="https://twitter.com/Barsotta/status/1171867623933526016?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 11, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.