Holy **** some of you are so dumb it's honestly exhausting.

Nobody said the guys on KCSN know anything you ****ing buffoon.

I'm saying that Matt Lance RT'd this guy because this guy has been nailing shit this free agency period.

Also from that guy…

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Giants?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Giants</a> are set to release QB Daniel Jones and designate him a post-June 1 cut, per source.</p>&mdash; Wesley Steinberg (@WesSteinberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/WesSteinberg/status/1767634183080300801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 12, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

At least those "whiffs" along with Richie didn't cost us much.

With that track history I'm shocked that people look at Hollywood and don't see the potential for a $15M whiff.

No, I'm simply saying that Matt Lane RT'd him because he's been nailing shit. That's it.

Waiting for you to acknowledge DJ's much better statistical analysis but I figure I'll be waiting awhile there.

You do realize guys usually get a little faster in the league right? And burners don't lose that step until they're into their 30s? LMAO That point is shitty bath water.

Love this if true. Hollywood is the perfect compliment to Rice. Now sign a veteran left tackle and we are going BPA in the draft.

All those deep balls that Mecole Hardman seemed to either lose in the lights or just flat out didnt see...yeah those are explosive plays and touchdowns woth Hollywood. Elite ball tracking ability.

The MVS role is EXACTLY why people are advocating for Hollywood - someone to stretch the field and threaten the DB's.

No, not just the "run fast" MVS role.

Do that, get open, throw him the ball. Big plays and all will follow.

I think he RT'd him because of this:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Credit to young Rickey Steinberg over here: <a href="https://twitter.com/PrettyRickey213?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PrettyRickey213</a> worth a follow folks!</p>&mdash; Wesley Steinberg (@WesSteinberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/WesSteinberg/status/1767302418881036663?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 11, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The pick in itself did, because it made them have to go pay someone. So the whiffs, in the long run, cost alot.

Shit - I was hoping someone would. That's why I brought it over here.

But I guess nobody wants to actually talk about Hollywood Brown but instead bitch about Twitter?

Maybe if he actually signs we'll get some dialogue there but oh well. Thought it merited some level of discourse as it seemed relevant to me anyway. I suspect there are makeable rebuttals that I wouldn't mind getting a chance to ponder.

I'm not in love with Hollywood Brown here - but I think there are some strengths he brings to the party and if anyone would like to attack those, be my guest so we can actually refine this whole thing a bit...

And again, they don't have to pay $15M to get the production they want out of the 3rd option in the passing offense.

Yes, but Brown has more versatility. MVS is just a guy who perenially is amongst the top ADOT guys in the league.

Being a guy who can take a top off the defense is nice when it’s not the only thing you are competent at (and MVS clearly was not even that this season).

I didn't see it Deej, is it in this thread? I'll take a look.

I mean, if you want to argue semantics, the MVS contract was a whiff as far as production, especially when you consider last year. MVS only saved himself with some big postseason catches.